Voting Station

Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar

Please vote to return to collections.

Scientist

The Resume

    (October 19, 1910-August 21, 1995)
    Born in Lahore, Pakistan
    Astrophysicist known for his work on the structure and evolution of stars
    Calculated the Chandrasekhar Limit for the maximum mass of a white dwarf (about 1.44 solar masses)
    Larger stars explode as supernovae, then collapse into either neutron stars or black holes
    First to propose the existence of black holes
    Naturalized US citizen (1953)
    Edited 'The Astrophysical Journal' (1952-71)
    Wrote the books 'Principles of Stellar Dynamics' (1942), 'Plasma Physics' (1960), 'The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes' (1983), 'Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science' (1987) and 'Newton's Principia for the Common Reader' (1995)
    Awarded the National Medal of Science (1966)
    Co-recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics (1983)
    Nephew of C.V. Raman, winner of the 1930 Nobel Prize in Physics

Why he might be annoying:

    His name is a bitch to say and write.
    He was a vegetarian.
    He considered leaving astrophysics after Sir Arthur Eddington mocked his suggestion that a massive star could collapse past white dwarf size into a point source.
    He complained that the Nobel Prize committee cited only his early work on white dwarfs, which he felt denigrated his later achievements.

Why he might not be annoying:

    He let friends, students and colleagues address him by the less daunting 'Chandra.'
    He was married to Lalitha Doraiswamy for 59 years.
    Eddington later sponsored his membership in the Royal Society. (Presumably Eddington's way of saying, 'Guess you were right about black holes. My bad.')
    He was the namesake for NASA's Chandra X-Ray Obervatory.
    British Astronomer Royal Martin Rees said, 'Chandra probably thought longer and deeper about our universe than anyone since Einstein.'

Credit: C. Fishel


Featured in the following Annoying Collections:

Year In Review:

    In 2023, Out of 3 Votes: 33.33% Annoying
    In 2022, Out of 4 Votes: 25.00% Annoying
    In 2021, Out of 19 Votes: 36.84% Annoying
    In 2020, Out of 1 Votes: 0% Annoying
    In 2019, Out of 6 Votes: 50.0% Annoying
    In 2018, Out of 2 Votes: 50.0% Annoying
    In 2017, Out of 6 Votes: 50.0% Annoying
    In 2016, Out of 2 Votes: 50.0% Annoying
    In 2015, Out of 12 Votes: 50.0% Annoying